Promise · Tested by only one or two votes

Defend Langley Park

Council has voted on this 1 time, in Aug 2024. Every decision went against it. Members never split on it. Adam Pacan, who made this promise, has not voted on it.

I'll keep defending our City's heritage, especially Langley ParkAdam Pacan · Candidate profile, 2025

In line meansA vote to protect Langley Park from development is in line.

Each member's record

Council has voted on this promise only 1 time, too few to say whether it is united or divided. ★ made this promise.

MemberRecordVotes in line
No member has voted on this often enough to judge.

Too few votes to judge: Reynolds (1), Goncalves (1), Doshi (1), Gobbert (1)

Did not vote on it: Lezer, Ko

Not yet on Council for these votes: Ma, Patton, Pacan ★

Every vote

YVoted in lineNVoted, not in line·Did not vote–Not yet on CouncilThe letter is how they voted.

REYGONLEZDOSGOBMAKOPATPAC

27 AUG 2024
Riverfront MasterplanUnanimous
Carried 7–0. In line with the promise: a No vote.
Why
The draft Riverfront Masterplan endorsed for consultation redevelops Langley Park itself: a Lagoon attraction, a 350-bay two-level car park under the parkland, food, retail and possible tourist accommodation nodes, a raised event lawn and a large play precinct. Defending Langley Park means AGAINST putting this development plan forward.

YREYBruce Reynolds voted Yes, not in lineYGONDavid Goncalves voted Yes, not in line·LEZYDOSRaj Doshi voted Yes, not in lineYGOBLiam Gobbert voted Yes, not in line–MA·KO–PAT–PAC
Yes: Reynolds, Goncalves, Doshi, Gobbert and 3 former councillors
Did not vote: Lezer, Ko
Not yet on Council: Ma, Patton, Pacan