Promise · Council united

Amenities for families and pets

Council has voted on this 5 times, between Feb 2021 and Aug 2026. Every decision went the promise's way. Members split on 1 of them. Catherine Lezer, who made this promise, voted in line 4 of 4 times.

Better amenities for families & petsCatherine Lezer · Candidate profile, 2020

In line meansA vote to fund or approve parks, playgrounds or dog areas is in line.

Each member's record

Strong consensus: Council was united, and went for this promise. A framed marker means the member voted with that united Council. ★ made this promise.

MemberRecordVotes in line
Catherine Lezer ★
Voted consistently forStrong consensus
4 of 4
split 1 of 1

Did not vote on it: Reynolds, Goncalves, Doshi, Gobbert, Ma, Ko, Patton, Pacan

Every vote

YVoted in lineNVoted, not in line·Did not vote–Not yet on CouncilThe letter is how they voted.

REYGONLEZDOSGOBMAKOPATPAC

25 AUG 2026
Notice of Motion: Langley Park Sports Club Use and Lighting for WalkersUnanimousMember’s motion
Carried 6–0. In line with the promise: a Yes vote.
Why
Seeking options for lighting for walking and dog walking at Langley Park works toward pet and family amenity.

YREYBruce Reynolds voted Yes, in lineYGONDavid Goncalves voted Yes, in lineYLEZCatherine Lezer voted Yes, in line·DOSYGOBLiam Gobbert voted Yes, in lineYMALisa Ma voted Yes, in line·KOYPATChris Patton voted Yes, in line·PAC
Yes (in line): Reynolds, Goncalves, Lezer, Gobbert, Ma, Patton
Did not vote: Doshi, Ko, Pacan
29 OCT 2024
Specification of Dog Exercise Areas and Dog Prohibited AreaUnanimous
Carried 9–0. In line with the promise: a Yes vote.
Why
Renewing five dog exercise areas, including Wellington Square, maintains pet amenity across the city.

YREYBruce Reynolds voted Yes, in lineYGONDavid Goncalves voted Yes, in lineYLEZCatherine Lezer voted Yes, in lineYDOSRaj Doshi voted Yes, in lineYGOBLiam Gobbert voted Yes, in line–MAYKOViktor Ko voted Yes, in line–PAT–PAC
Yes (in line): Reynolds, Goncalves, Lezer, Doshi, Gobbert, Ko and 3 former councillors
Not yet on Council: Ma, Patton, Pacan
13 DEC 2022
Specification of Dog Exercise Areas: Dog Act 1976Unanimous
Carried 7–0. In line with the promise: a Yes vote.
Why
Specifying two fenced off-lead dog parks as dog exercise areas directly provides pet amenity.

–REY–GON·LEZ–DOSYGOBLiam Gobbert voted Yes, in line–MAYKOViktor Ko voted Yes, in line–PAT–PAC
Yes (in line): Gobbert, Ko and 5 former councillors
Did not vote: Lezer
Not yet on Council: Reynolds, Goncalves, Doshi, Ma, Patton, Pacan
21 DEC 2021
Fenced Off-Lead Dog Park InvestigationUnanimous
Carried 8–0. In line with the promise: a Yes vote.
Why
Expanding one fenced off-lead dog park and creating another directly adds pet amenity.

–REY–GONYLEZCatherine Lezer voted Yes, in line–DOSYGOBLiam Gobbert voted Yes, in line–MAYKOViktor Ko voted Yes, in line–PAT–PAC
Yes (in line): Lezer, Gobbert, Ko and 5 former councillors
Not yet on Council: Reynolds, Goncalves, Doshi, Ma, Patton, Pacan
23 FEB 2021
Notice of Motion: Fenced Off-Lead Dog ParkMember’s motion
Carried 8–1. In line with the promise: a Yes vote.
Why
Requests investigation of sites and options for a fenced off-lead dog park and a provisional sum in the 2021/22 budget for its costs (minutes p1101).

–REY–GONYLEZCatherine Lezer voted Yes, in line–DOSYGOBLiam Gobbert voted Yes, in line–MAYKOViktor Ko voted Yes, in line–PAT–PAC
Yes (in line): Lezer, Gobbert, Ko and 5 former councillors
No: 1 former councillor
Not yet on Council: Reynolds, Goncalves, Doshi, Ma, Patton, Pacan